Best of the Web
December 4, 2012

While someone smoking pot at a table on a patio or next to a window might run afoul of the Amendment 64 ban on “openly and publicly” consuming marijuana, someone invisible from the street might not, especially if he pays a membership fee for the privilege.
Can this law (amendment) not be challenged, as an infringement under freedom rights, also under anti-competition laws as it stagnates business development? How would one differentiate from a cigarette and a joint – smell? Obviously any smoking – tobacco laws that are in place would have to extend to joints. Also consider that the "COFFEE" shops could furnish VAPORIZERS for the clientèle use – small fee would apply. You merely need to get creative and legally aggressive.